Summary of Campbell & Von Renesse – Learning to Love Math Through Explorations of Maypole Patterns
Campbell and Von
Renesse explore how mathematical understanding can emerge through embodied,
collaborative exploration using Maypole dancing and ribbon weaving as a medium.
Rather than beginning with abstract notation or symbolic representation, the
authors position movement and colour as entry points into structural reasoning.
As students repeat crossing movements around the
Maypole, woven patterns emerge that show repetition, rotation, and movement
across the design.
The article emphasizes
that learners often discover mathematical structure before they have formal
language to describe it. As dancers rotate and interlace ribbons, visible
patterns emerge that reflect underlying algorithms. Each change in movement
sequence produces a new woven structure. In this way, choreography becomes
geometry, and repetition becomes mathematical reasoning.
A key theme in the
article is joy, not as entertainment, but as intellectual engagement. Students
are not passively following rules; they are constructing them. They experiment
with colour order, crossing sequences, and movement rhythm. The resulting
patterns are not decorative accidents; they are the frozen traces of embodied
mathematical decisions.
Ultimately, the article argues that mathematics can be experienced as relational, aesthetic, and communal. Movement becomes a legitimate pathway into abstraction.
Three “Stops” While
Reading
Stop 1 – I Had to
Illustrate the Patterns to Make Sense of Them
As I worked through
the woven Maypole images, I realized that I could not understand the patterns
by simply looking at them. I had to draw them. Recreating the structures
allowed me to isolate repeating units and identify strand directions.
Rather than reading
the colour sequences horizontally, I began tracing structural paths and
searching for rigid shapes that repeated. The act of drawing shifted my
thinking from noticing colours to identifying generative rules.
Illustrating the
patterns became a form of mathematical reasoning. It forced me to slow down and
reconstruct the logic embedded in the weave.
I began to struggle when I reached Figure 20, so I reorganized the pattern in my mind using letter notation. Labeling the sequence as BB BB WR helped me isolate where that structure actually appeared within the image. Instead of scanning the pattern visually, I traced the sequence systematically to locate its repetition. Once I adopted this strategy, I continued using it with all the remaining figures. Creating my own simplified representations that matched the assigned letter sequences made it much easier to identify the structural logic of each pattern. Reconstructing the images in this way allowed me to see the repetition more clearly and understand how the sequence generated the overall design.
Stop 2 – It Felt
Like Tetris
At one point, the
patterns began to feel like a Tetris game. I found myself identifying composite
blocks small rectangular units that could rotate and translate across the
pattern. Instead of reading strings like BB BR GW, I began seeing rigid shapes
that interlocked.
This shift changed my
perspective from linear sequence to spatial transformation. I began thinking
about rotation, translation, and symmetry rather than simple repetition. The
patterns were not just alternating colours; they were tessellations generated through
movement.
Stop 3 – A
Cartesian Plane Might Have Helped
Another pause came
when I wondered whether placing the patterns on a Cartesian grid would clarify
the structure. If I could mark repeating intersections and locate centers of
rotation, I might more easily identify the translation vectors and symmetry points.
Some patterns were
easy to sit with; others required sustained concentration. I imagined
physically cutting out shapes and placing them on a grid to test rotational
symmetry. This reflection revealed how embodied mathematics and formal geometry
could support each other rather than exist separately.
Reflections on the
Videos
The videos reinforced
the idea that mathematics lives within movement.
The early video
featuring adults reflecting on childhood mathematics revealed how deeply math
is embedded in lived experience: cooking, knitting, climbing stairs in
different configurations, playing with geometric toys. Movement and structure
often precede formal naming.
Malke Rosenfeld’s Jump
Into Math! talk was particularly compelling. Watching her create rhythm
with her feet demonstrated how mathematical relationships can be heard and
felt. Rhythm becomes number. Timing becomes ratio. Her classroom integration of
body percussion shows how conceptual understanding can be strengthened through
coordinated movement.
The Rhythm of Math
videos further emphasized this idea. The clapping sequences required intense
concentration and collaboration. The 3-against-4 rhythm made proportional
reasoning tangible. You could hear the mathematics at work.
The string and sword
dance videos connected most directly to the Maypole reading. Watching dancers
maintain a closed loop while executing precise sequences highlighted the
algorithmic nature of movement. The patterns were not accidental, they were
generated through rule-based choreography. The visible concentration on the
dancers’ faces reinforced that maintaining structure requires attention to
sequence and symmetry.
Across all videos, one
theme remained consistent: movement makes structure visible.
Final Activity
Reflection
Adrienne Clancy –
Dancing Rotations
Adrienne Clancy’s
discussion of rotation, including the Earth’s 23.5º tilt, reframed rotation as
lived experience rather than static diagram. Watching her embody rotation
emphasized that angles, axes, and symmetry are not merely drawn; they are
enacted.
This resonated deeply
with my own classroom practice this week.
I read Pitter
Patter Pat to my Kindergarten–Grade 2 students in the library. The book
explores patterns in time, nature, and dance. After reading, we stood together
and created a simple movement pattern involving clapping, stomping, and
jumping. The students physically enacted the pattern.
In that moment,
mathematics was not abstract. It was rhythmic, communal, and embodied.
Our school is
currently focusing on respect for self and others, including body awareness.
Movement-based mathematics supports this work. Coordinated rhythm requires
listening, awareness of space, and attention to others.
This week affirmed
that mathematics is part of the palette of choreography. It shapes how we move,
how we see structure, and how we understand the world. Whether through Maypole
weaving, rhythm, sword dancing, or children’s storybooks, mathematical ideas
emerge through embodied engagement.
