Multisensory
Activity: Taste the Ratio (Skittles)
While working with a
handful of Skittles, I began thinking about how this task could be redesigned
through the lens of tactile and sensory access, as discussed in Stylianidou and
Nardi (2019). Inspired by their work with blind and sighted pupils, I imagined
an activity where students would temporarily blindfold themselves and engage
with the mathematics through taste rather than colour.
In this version of the
task, students would taste the Skittles and describe them by flavour rather
than colour. For example, brown could be described as berry punch, blue as
raspberry, green as melon berry, red as wild cherry, and orange as strawberry.
The focus shifts from visual identification to sensory discrimination and
language.
Students would then
engage in a “Taste the Ratio” activity. They would identify ratios (for
example, berry punch to raspberry), predict how different ratios might affect
the overall taste, and combine Skittles to create ratios such as 2:3 or 1:4.
Students could explore equivalent ratios by scaling their mixtures and compare
how the taste changes as proportions change.
Mathematically, this
task supports reasoning about ratios, equivalence, and scaling. Conceptually,
it reframes ratio as something that can be experienced, not just
calculated. The sweetness of the task is intentional—engagement, pleasure, and
curiosity become part of the mathematical experience rather than distractions
from it.
This activity directly
reflects the argument made by Stylianidou and Nardi (2019): when learning
experiences are designed to work without relying on a single sense, they
benefit all learners. Blindfolding the class removes vision as the dominant
sense, allowing all students to participate in the same way. Rather than
creating a special accommodation for students with visual impairments, the task
becomes universally designed, supporting inclusion while also expanding how
sighted students understand mathematical relationships.
In this way, the task
challenges ableist assumptions about how mathematics must be accessed and
demonstrates how multisensory experiences can lead to deeper, more meaningful,
and more lasting mathematical understanding.
This really pushed me to think about how and why bodies matter to mathematics. Your post shows that ratio isn’t only a symbolic relationship. It also raises the harder question: do different bodies matter differently? From a social construction perspective, many “differences” (gendered, racialized, abled) become mathematically consequential not because of inherent capacity, but because classrooms uphold norms about sensing, explaining, and engagement; universal-design tasks like yours can surface the structure without centering one “normal” body.
ReplyDelete